Autism and the Criminal Justice System – Part 1

Tone of Voice – this is a continuation of the last point – if somebody was being questioned by the police their tone of voice might be expected to betray them; they might sound nervous or confident, relaxed or shocked.  But a percentage of people with autism have quite monotone voices.  The tone of their voice rarely changes despite what they may be feeling on the inside.  A completely innocent person might be questioned over a terrible crime, and yet they might keep the same calm look, and flat steady voice throughout the entire interview, despite how shaken the nature of the crime they were being accused of might have made them feel on the inside.

Remorse – the concept of showing remorse for a crime that has been committed can be a very important one when it comes to sentencing.  Not all autistic people accused of crimes will be innocent, but being able to convey the feelings of remorse in a way that will impact on judges, and juries might prove to be difficult.  It could be that somebody with autism simply cannot recognise the level of emotions that they may be feeling, and have no way of putting them in to words.  It is a sad habit of humanity that people often judge others emotional sincerity by comparing their actions to how they themselves would have behaved in the same situation.  An example of this that is recognisable to many people is if somebody doesn’t cry after the death of a loved one; people seem to think that it is ok to criticise because it is assumed that grieving involves crying.  If somebody with autism can`t demonstrate the stereo-typical types of behaviour, and expression that supposedly go along with feelings like remorse, then it is likely that they will be judged much more harshly.

Alibi – innocent until proven guilty is a commonly used phrase.  It can be difficult because sometimes telling the truth isn’t quite good enough to prove innocence.  It has become a bit of cliché in police dramas for a suspect to say that they were home alone all night, and they don’t have anybody to back up their alibi.  The problem is that for the logical autistic mind, the issue isn’t to prove themselves innocent, it is for the police to attempt to prove them guilty.  If they know they are innocent then they might assume that this will eventually be proven.  Unfortunately with so many innocent people ending up in prison, it is evident that this is not always the case.  Not being proactive enough in proving an alibi, or overall innocence could lead to serious problems.

Volunteering Information – it may be the case that somebody with autism might not be able to volunteer information.  They may need a specific question to provoke an answer.  Somebody might be asked when they last spoke to a person and they could say that they talked on Wednesday.  If asked if they had been in contact with the person since they would say no, simply because it didn’t occur to them to volunteer the information that they had seen the person driving past their house on Saturday afternoon.  For people who don’t have this problem it`s a difficult one to understand, but sometimes it is the case that it just simply doesn’t occur to somebody to say something, however important it may be, unless they are directly asked about it.

Strong Sense of Justice – a strong sense of justice is often cited as a positive trait of autism.  One problem with this though can be the fact that when an autistic person believes an injustice is being done they may stand up against it whatever the cost.  In some circumstances this can be a good thing, but in others, when the injustice is something as simple as having to pay a fine, or to stop playing music at a certain volume, then refusing to comply with this apparent injustice can be problematic.  The police may very well not understand that the person has autism, and may think that they are disregarding the rules out of a sense of superiority, or contempt.

Illogical Rules – lots of autistic people will follow the rules to the letter every day of their life, until they come across one which doesn’t make logical sense, then they may simply disregard it.  An example of this that most people, autistic or not, would probably find relatable, would be downloading music.  It might not be such a big deal now, but a few years ago there was a campaign against it, likening it to theft, and reminding people that it was illegal.  But hardly anybody could see the sense in this, and so everybody continued to download it anyway.  More often than not it is not ok to tell somebody with autism that there is a set rule they need to follow – that rule and the reasons behind it needs to be explained to them.

Naïve, and easily Influenced – even though it goes without saying, it is worth reiterating that not all autistic people are naïve, and easily influenced.  But sadly some can be.  It could be something such as trusting a police officer when they say there is no need for a lawyer, or admitting to things they don’t really want to admit to because of pressure being put upon them.   Perhaps the manipulating forces could come from the other side; being manipulated in to taking sole responsibility for a crime, or in to holding drugs for somebody.  Autistic people themselves are quick to point out that they can be vulnerable to occurrences such as this.  There is also the fact that they will most likely be suffering a sensory overload when being questioned, meaning that they cannot think clearly, and this can make autistic people incredibly vulnerable when they come in to contact with law enforcement agencies.

The above points may make it sound as if all autistic people are victims waiting to happen, and all law enforcement officers are clumsy, and insensitive.  But this is obviously not true, and not what this article is meant to be saying at all.  It is hoped that most members of the justice system will have a level of understanding about autism, and some knowledge of how to deal with it in a professional context.  And there will be many autistic people who will have, if not positive, at least bearable encounters with law enforcement.  And this isn’t to say that people with autism should be let off lightly simply because they are autistic.  All it is saying is that this level of professional understanding needs to apply to not just the majority, but the entirety of people involved in the criminal justice system.

Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2015 Autism Daily Newscast

Pages: 1 2

Top Stories and Breaking News

Researchers hope to revolutionize autism diagnosis through Autism & Beyond app

New York — A team of researchers from Duke are hoping to revolutionize how autism is diagnosed in young children through an iPhone app called ‘Autism & Beyond’. The researchers are working closely with Apple in hopes of improving how autism is diagnosed in children today. Due to the surge of the number of children […]

The damage of Chlorine Dioxide also peddled as Miracle Mineral Solution

For those of you that do not know there’s a very real threat to our autistic children in the world today. Naive parents and carers are being told that parasitic worms are the cause of autism in their children. They are being told that if they remove these worms with CD (Chlorine Dioxide) treatments the […]

Blogging mother, Temporary Tourist, shares her experiences of Disney’s Guest Assistance rule change

We’ve had mixed responses on Disney’s decision to change the Guest Assistance Card system. We reported Autism Hippie’s experiences on October 11. Disney implemented a change in their guest assistance cards for children and adults with special needs on October 9 after reports that people were flagrantly abusing the old system. Cards called Disability Access […]

About Paddy-Joe Moran

Paddy-Joe Moran is a nineteen year old author of two books and blog writer with Aspergers from the U.K.
Blog. http://askpergers.wordpress.com/
Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/ASKPERGERS?ref=hl
Twitter: https://twitter.com/ASKPERGERS
Books. http://www.jkp.com/catalogue/author/1762

Comments

  1. Alexis Drzewucki says:

    Hello! I’m noticing that there has been a ton of focus on Autism and the criminal justice system and I came across this article after reading one concerning Asperger’s and domestic violence. May I make a suggestion on a future article for whomever it may concern? Asperger’s/Autism and domestic violence where the perpetrators are the actual parents. I see so much focus on autism and interacting with the law and dealing with romantic domestic abusers but, not much about autism and family domestic violence. I believe that it could be incredibly useful and help spread awareness about this problem.

  2. My 21 yr old son has Aspergers and is currently incarcerated . The courts would not allow his Autism to be allowed in court. He is currrently in jail awaiting sentencing. We need the court system to understand people on the spectrum. I will continue to fight for my son but as of now-he’s going to prison for a crime he doesn’t remember committing and was told he did it and they had him on video doing it (a tactic) so he confessed. Its an injustice!

  3. As part of a police officers training, would it not be prudent to include some modules on Autism and Asperger syndrome?